[next page (Sect 1.2)] | [previous page (Tandem Specs)] | [index] | [top]
1.0 FUNDAMENTAL SYMMETRIES, WEAK INTERACTIONS AND NUCLEAR ASTROPHYSICS

1.1 Measurements of the alpha-beta angular correlations in the beta decays of 8Li and 8B

M. Beck, D.T. Corcoran, L. De Braeckeleer, M. Felton, H. Lawler, J.P.S. van Schagen,

H.E. Swanson, D.W. Storm, D. Wright and Z. Zhao

The alpha-beta angular correlation in beta decays of 8Li and 8B are being studied as part of a test of CVC or a search for second class currents. As has been explained previously1, in each of these beta decays the angular correlation has the form

equation 01

The coefficient a2 results from induced weak currents. The a1 coefficient results from the recoil of the 8Be produced in the beta decays. Both of these coefficients are expected to be roughly proportional to the energy of the beta particle. For 10 MeV beta particles the kinematic term, a1, should be 10% and the term resulting from induced currents, a2, is expected to be around ±3 to 4%, where the + sign is for 8Li decay. Because the decaying states in 8B and 8Li are members of an iso-triplet, when the a2 values obtained in each decay are subtracted, the difference results from weak magnetism, weak electricity, and from possible second class currents. If CVC holds and there are no second class currents, this term can be related to the isovector M1 and E2 widths of the decay of the corresponding member of the isotriplet in 8Be. This photon measurement is discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, and our results have been published2.

Our measurement of the angular correlation in the decay of 8Li has been reported previously1,3 where an upgrade of the apparatus involving two more beta detectors was mentioned. In addition, the mylar windows of the alpha-particle counters were changed from 200 to 140 µg/cm² thickness. In order to do the 8B measurement effectively, the terminal ion source was developed4 for intense 3He beams. During the previous year the system with the new beta counters was first tested with 8Li and then, using the terminal ion source, we carried out test runs with 8B, followed by a long run with 8B. We had to change the targetry for the 8B production, because the intense 3He beams overheated the nickel foil target wheel. (The 8B is produced by the 6Li(3He,n) on a rotating wheel coated with 6LiF. The 8B activity recoils into a carbon catcher foil.) Copper, mounted on a black painted wheel, withstood the beam power and the LiF did not evaporate. While analyzing the new 8B data, a new beta detector calibration technique was developed (see the following section).

Because of the symmetry of the experiment, we make two simultaneous measurements of the angular correlation with either of two alpha counters providing the reference. From the 8B test run we obtained values for a1u/Ebeta of (-9.7±1.4)×10-3 MeV-1 and for a1d/Ebeta of (-9.1±0.9)×10-3 MeV-1, while a2u/Ebeta was (-5.2±0.9)×10-3 MeV-1 and a2d/Ebeta was (-4.9±0.9)×10-3 MeV-1. The subscripts u and d refer to the alpha particle counter upstream or downstream of the catcher, respectively. The agreement between the two pairs of values is encouraging. Although not strictly proportional to beta energy, the values of a1 do exhibit the expected beta energy dependence, except for the case of a1d at the highest energies.

The measurement of 8B requires more running time than 8Li, in spite of the higher 3He beam intensity we have obtained, because of the lower production rate. We now have 2.2×107 events, compared to the total of 1.6×108 for 8Li. The final analysis of these data is presently underway.


1 Nuclear Physics Laboratory Annual Report, University of Washington (1995) p.27.
2 L. De Braeckeleer et al., Phys. Rev. C 51, 2778 (1995).
3 K.Swartz, "Measurement of the beta-alpha angular correlation in the decay of 8Li," Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington, 1996.
4 Nuclear Physics Laboratory Annual Report, University of Washington, p. 61 (1995); G. Harper et al., Proc. Seventh Int'l. Conf. on Heavy Ion Accel. Tech. (1995), to be published in Nucl. Instrum. Methods.
[next page (Sect 1.2)] | [previous page (Tandem Specs)] | [index] | [top]