neutrino is one of nature's most peculiar particles. It has 1/2 unit of spin but
no electric charge, a near-zero rest-mass, and it interacts with other particles
only through gravity and the weak interaction. It can pass through light years
of lead without an interaction. There is good experimental evidence that the
Earth receives only about 1/3 of the neutrinos that the Sun should be producing
and sending in our direction.
written several previous columns about neutrinos. One discussed the then-current
evidence for a neutrino with a huge 17 keV rest-mass (see Analog, December,
1991). Several other columns considered the possibility that the electron
neutrino might have an imaginary rest-mass characteristic of faster-than-light
tachyon particles (see Analog, September, 1992 and October, 1993). I will start
this column by saying that from new experimental results, it is now clear that
neutrinos do not have a 17 keV mass (that was a detector artifact)
and are not tachyons (that was a subtle artifact of the physics
and chemistry of the tritium sources used). We now understand much more about
neutrinos, and this column will present some of that understanding.
me start by reviewing the Standard Model of particle physics as it applies to
neutrinos. There are two classes of fundamental spin 1/2 particles, the
strongly-interacting quarks and the weakly-interacting leptons. Three of the
leptons (e, m,
have significant masses, and all three have the same electric charge. The other
three leptons (ne,
have zero charge and are called neutrinos. The simplest form of
the Standard Model assumes that neutrinos, like photons and gluons, have zero
rest-mass. However, we have had to change that assumption, based on new
experimental evidence. Neutrinos have very small masses (probably a few
hundredths of an electron-volt), they usually travel at nearly (but not quite)
the speed of light, and they rarely interact with anything.
sun is a giant thermonuclear reactor that burns hydrogen into helium, making
lots of neutrinos in the process. You can think of the Sun's thermonuclear
reaction as applying heat and pressure that forces hydrogen nuclei to
"eat" their orbiting electron and change their charges to become
neutrons, spitting out the neutrino "lepton seeds" that are left over.
About 61 billion neutrinos per second made in the Sun pass through each square
centimeter of area on the surface of the Earth. If your body presents an area to
the sum of a square meter, this means that 610 trillion neutrinos are passing
right through your body in the second it takes to read this line. But you don't
notice this because there are no interactions.
pass through your body and through the Earth as if neither was there. As you
might imagine, this makes neutrinos very difficult to detect... but not
impossible. Over the last quarter of the twentieth century, a succession of
large underground neutrino detectors has demonstrated that (a) the neutrinos
from the Sun can be detected and that (b) there is a discrepancy of a factor of
three between the number of neutrinos predicted by astrophysical theories and
the number of neutrinos actually detected. This is known as the Solar Neutrino
Problem. At the end of the twentieth century, it was number five on my list of
the top ten things that we do not understand about physics (see Analog,
July/August, 1999). However, in the past few years, important new information
about neutrinos has come from observations by the SNO, KamLAND and WMAP
detectors, and the Solar Neutrino Problem has essentially been solved.
Some years ago, the Canadian government began a
program for developing and selling nuclear power reactors, called CANDU
reactors. These were fueled with natural uranium and moderated with "heavy
water," that is, with water made with deuterium instead of hydrogen. This
made economic sense, because
are opportunists. The large reservoir of Canadian heavy water represented an
experimental opportunity that could not be overlooked. After years of proposal
writing and some delicate negotiations between the
neutrinos pass through heavy water, they can interact in several ways. In the
first process, which is called a "charged-current interaction," the
incoming neutrino can convert the deuterium nucleus into two protons and an
electron. Essentially, a neutron and neutrino change charges through a W
boson to become a proton and electron. The electron carries off most of the
original neutrino's energy and will make a flash of Cerenkov light in the heavy
the second process, which is called a "neutral-current interaction,"
the in-coming neutrino breaks up the deuterium nucleus into a proton and a
neutron. Essentially, a neutron and neutrino interact through a Z boson. The
neutron subsequently is captured by another nucleus, producing a gamma ray that
can be detected from the flash of Cerenkov light by a photo-electron.
the third process, which is called a "neutrino elastic scattering,"
the incoming neutrino bounces off the electron of a deuterium atom. Here, the
electron and neutrino interact through a either a Z
or W boson. The electron carries off part of the neutrino's energy and
will make a flash of Cerenkov light in the heavy water. These three types of
interactions generate somewhat different signals and are distinguishable in the
SNO detector is selectively sensitive to electron neutrinos (ne) through the charged-current interactions, and is
unselectively sensitive to all three neutrino species (ne,
through the neutral and elastic interactions. Therefore, if the missing 2/3 of
the neutrinos from the Sun are absent because they have "oscillated"
from ne to nm
they should contribute to the neutral and elastic interactions, but not the
sure enough, when the SNO data was analyzed, the solar neutrinos missing in the
charged-current interactions turned up in the neutral and elastic interactions.
The Solar Neutrino Problem occurs because all three neutrino species have small
and slightly different rest-masses. As they propagate through space, the small
mass differences modify the quantum interference between species, and ne
are transformed into nm
(and back again). Before SNO
operated, there were several alternative theories for how neutrinos might
oscillate. The SNO results are
consistent with only one of these theories, the so-called LMA (Large Mixing
Angle) solution, and indicate that the electron neutrinos are oscillating into
another neutrino species (presumably nm)
that has a difference in mass-squared |m(ne)2
– m(nm)2| of 8 ´ 10-5 electron-volts2.
(Kamioka liquid-scintillator Anti-Neutrino Detector)
neutrinos detected by SNO travel 150 million kilometers, so there is a very long
path length over which the oscillations between neutrino species can occur.
Rather surprisingly, the SNO data suggests that the path distance over which
significant neutrino oscillations occur is fairly short, only a few hundred
rather short oscillation length has been tested by the KamLAND experiment
KamLAND detector will continue to operate for some time with improving
statistics, but in the initial period of its operation the consortium has
reported evidence for neutrino oscillations consistent with the LMA solution,
with a difference in mass-squared |m(ne)2
of about 7 ´
10-5 electron-volts2. Thus, neutrino oscillations have
been detected for both neutrinos from the Sun and anti-neutrinos from nuclear
power reactors and give consistent results.
(Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe)
problem with the new SNO and KamLAND results is that they measure |m(ne)2 – m(nm)2| rather than m(ne) and m(nm).
In a column published in the October
2003 issue of Analog, I described the results of the WMAP satellite probe, which
mapped the small angle fluctuations of the cosmic microwave background, the
reverberating "sound of the Big Bang" when our universe was about
380,000 years old.
turns out that the WMAP data also has something to say about the rest-mass of
neutrino species. This is because massive neutrinos fall into the general
cosmological category of "hot dark matter," which tends to smear out
the "clumpiness" of the early universe. The
WMAP data, because it views this initial clumpiness, places fairly stringent
limits on how much hot dark matter could have existed in the early universe. The
data indicate that the mass density of neutrinos in the universe cannot be
larger than about 2% of critical density. This
translates to 1.0 electron-volts as the sum of the rest-masses of all three
that the electron neutrino (ne)
is no more massive than the other two neutrino types, this result limits its
mass to no more than 0.33 electron-volts. This is to be compared with laboratory
measurements of tritium beta decay, which place a corresponding upper limit of
2.2 electron-volts. Thus, cosmology
has beaten laboratory physics in placing a limit on the rest-mass of the
electron neutrino by almost an order of magnitude.
results from SNO, KamLAND, and WMAP are not the final word on neutrino physics,
but they have answered some outstanding questions. We know that about 2/3 of the
neutrinos reaching the Earth from the Sun are in the form of nm
We know that neutrinos are not tachyons and have positive mass-squared values
with differences that suggest (but do not prove) that the masses are around 0.01
electron-volts. We know from WMAP
that in no case can the electron neutrino have more mass than around 0.33
electron-volts. We also know that
about 93% of the universe's mass-energy is in the form of some mysterious dark
energy and cold dark matter, with only 7% left for ordinary matter including
neutrinos. We now know that we live
in a very peculiar universe.
"Neutrino Physics: an Update," Wick C. Haxton and Barry R. Holstein, American Journal of Physics 72, 18-24 (2004), preprint hep-ph/0306282.
SF Novels by John Cramer: my two hard SF novels, Twistor and Einstein's Bridge, are newly released as eBooks by Book View Cafe and are available at : http://bookviewcafe.com/bookstore/?s=Cramer .
Columns Online: Electronic
reprints of about 177 "The Alternate View" columns by John G.
Cramer, previously published in